There's a lot of rhetoric and extremism out there around almost every issue, including energy policy. With all the noise, it can be hard to separate the fact from folly.
Grounded in Fact is for people who are looking for a more balanced, reasonable discourse on issues ranging from divestment to the “Keep It in the Ground” movement.
Please make yourself at home and feel free to contact us if you have any questions or would like additional information, and don’t forget to follow @GroundedinFact on Twitter and join our Facebook Group.
The five claims that make up the foundation of last year’s Dakota Access pipeline protests are falsehoods. Not “that’s just their opinion” falsehoods; these claims are patently and demonstrably untrue. Yet they continue to thrive in the fertilizer-rich environment of the Internet.
EarthFirst! provided $500,000 in seed money to a group of “violent eco-terrorist infiltrators” who then “initiated direct action training for its own members and other protestors interested in engaging in violent conflict and incited and perpetrated acts of terrorism.”
Just weeks after Energy Transfer Partners filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace and other members of the anti-pipeline “enterprise,” at least four members of that enterprise—350.org, the Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club, and Food and Water Watch—have teamed up with other extremist groups to launch the “Stop Energy Transfer Partners” campaign’s National Day of Action (September 8-9), which is chock full of the same lies that ETP is suing them for in the first place.
How far would you go to combat climate change? Forgo having children? Kill your dog? Wish your parents (or grandparents) an early death?
But the nuns' embrace of multi-family residential construction would suggest that their lawsuit is less about their religious right to “treasure land as a gift of beauty,” and more about Lancaster Against Pipelines’ embrace of the “Keep It in the Ground” movement’s activist agenda.
While CDP said the report is “aimed at investors wishing to better understand the amount of carbon associated with their fossil fuel holdings,” it’s important to understand that the activists have also threatened to use this database in future lawsuits against individual oil and natural gas companies.
Upon hearing this damning and unambiguous recommendation against divestment, the never-at-a-loss-for-words activist group 350 Seattle live-tweeted this thoughtful rejoinder: “ARRAGGGGGGGHHH.”
Much like faith-healing sects whose strict anti-medical religious doctrines result in countless preventable deaths of innocent children, the anti-pipeline “religion” threatens to harm the very people it purports to “protect.”
The Oklahoma Attorney General's letter to California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones didn't pull any punches, stating "Your call for divestment and attempt to publicly shame those who invest in American energy appears to be driven by politics unrelated to insurance regulation, animus towards the fossil fuel industry and those that depend on it, and a desire to discriminate against those who transact in commerce that mostly takes place outside your state."
Yet, many people—apparently ignorant of the vital role that oil and natural gas play in their daily lives—continue to signal their virtue by simultaneously denouncing and depending on oil and natural gas.